<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial: The Worst Article I&#8217;ve Ever Wrote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: game-hacks</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>game-hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.game-hacks.net/runescape-hacks.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;runescape hacks 
&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.game-hacks.net/runescape-hacks.html" rel="nofollow">runescape hacks<br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Life Sky Navy -- Flying High And Large &#171; The Second Life Times</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1267</link>
		<dc:creator>Second Life Sky Navy -- Flying High And Large &#171; The Second Life Times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1267</guid>
		<description>[...] The Worst Article I&#8217;ve Ever Wrote April 15, 2006 (An Oppinionated Look on SL Militaries due to the introduction of ANSUCKS, and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Worst Article I&#8217;ve Ever Wrote April 15, 2006 (An Oppinionated Look on SL Militaries due to the introduction of ANSUCKS, and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>Ok, so your health systems prevent black-screening. Fair enough. However, when somone goes down, are they going to get back up again after a certain amount of time and carry on the fight? What'll stop the less scrupilous players from camping them? The best you could honestly do is to ask them nicely not to, unless (maybe) you wanted a set function that teleported a person to a safe area of the sim upon death. Supposing you did take this approach, how much sim-reworking would be done? And would you need different systems per sim?

Back on to an unrelated point. This treaty is currently open to very few groups. So, when the system is finalised to their specifications, what will happen to any new signatories? Would there suggestions fall on deaf ears, or would they reform a system already in use by many other groups? What effects would this have on those already playing?

And I do believe the arrest of the Templars was in no small part due to the actions of the then current (and last) Grand Master, Jaques de Molay. Hence the name of the Alliance Navy corvette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so your health systems prevent black-screening. Fair enough. However, when somone goes down, are they going to get back up again after a certain amount of time and carry on the fight? What&#8217;ll stop the less scrupilous players from camping them? The best you could honestly do is to ask them nicely not to, unless (maybe) you wanted a set function that teleported a person to a safe area of the sim upon death. Supposing you did take this approach, how much sim-reworking would be done? And would you need different systems per sim?</p>
<p>Back on to an unrelated point. This treaty is currently open to very few groups. So, when the system is finalised to their specifications, what will happen to any new signatories? Would there suggestions fall on deaf ears, or would they reform a system already in use by many other groups? What effects would this have on those already playing?</p>
<p>And I do believe the arrest of the Templars was in no small part due to the actions of the then current (and last) Grand Master, Jaques de Molay. Hence the name of the Alliance Navy corvette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan Schuman</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan Schuman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Considering that I'm the one paying for the base shell of GunGrade's development, which right now I have budgeted to cost L$30,000, that's my forward assertion of generosity to make this project work. As for why the date was chosen... the ANSUCKS convention to declare the intent for MOSCOW and get community input was held on Friday the 13th. If you know your history, it was on Friday, October 13th of 1307 that King Philip IV of France ordered the arrests of numerous French Templars. The original event occurred in 1307. 1+3=4, 4/07, April 2007. We found humor in that, so that was the day that was chosen.

To address the concerns about one company profiting off GunGrade, there has been a substantial amount of input provided regarding profit monopoly and identity expression through technology, so GunGrade has been put on hold while a new system is worked out. That's the nice thing about MOSCOW, you know. It -ENCOURAGES- members to get their input in, voice their concerns, and make sure that changes are made for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that I&#8217;m the one paying for the base shell of GunGrade&#8217;s development, which right now I have budgeted to cost L$30,000, that&#8217;s my forward assertion of generosity to make this project work. As for why the date was chosen&#8230; the ANSUCKS convention to declare the intent for MOSCOW and get community input was held on Friday the 13th. If you know your history, it was on Friday, October 13th of 1307 that King Philip IV of France ordered the arrests of numerous French Templars. The original event occurred in 1307. 1+3=4, 4/07, April 2007. We found humor in that, so that was the day that was chosen.</p>
<p>To address the concerns about one company profiting off GunGrade, there has been a substantial amount of input provided regarding profit monopoly and identity expression through technology, so GunGrade has been put on hold while a new system is worked out. That&#8217;s the nice thing about MOSCOW, you know. It -ENCOURAGES- members to get their input in, voice their concerns, and make sure that changes are made for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Yeats</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Yeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Personally, I could care less about getting paid, in fact I have been contemplating doing it for an extremely low price, perhaps even free. The SL military community needs to move away from LL damage, because it presents the possibility of (and often times does result in) Blackscreening (spawnkill). We've needed a new system for a long time, and until now, nobody has been doing anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I could care less about getting paid, in fact I have been contemplating doing it for an extremely low price, perhaps even free. The SL military community needs to move away from LL damage, because it presents the possibility of (and often times does result in) Blackscreening (spawnkill). We&#8217;ve needed a new system for a long time, and until now, nobody has been doing anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>I agree when you say that only time will tell. If this can get working the way it is intended, it will indeed create a nice little community of peaceful (?) players. 

Anyway, I apologise for alienating you and your group, it's just that I honestly feel that there will not be a fair competition. Until recently I was under the impression that Titan would be the sole creators anyway, given their approach when talking about it.

So, they say there's going to be one 'company' building the weapons? Mmm... why not just have the other doing the UpGrade system? After all, any bias presented by one group would quickly be outweighed by the other. 

Anyway, I've just returned from another trip into Second Life and I saw something of the meeting thanks to a supplied chatlog. Seems to me that Ethan has focussed his agression more on "Alienating the Alliance Navy" than "Providing a fun, fair combat system for Second Life militaries". Maybe I'm just paranoid, but Ethan has never seemed such a giving person in other, earlier conversations. Neither have the Merczateers, who are funding this. It just... bothers me as to the possibilities of a hidden agenda here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree when you say that only time will tell. If this can get working the way it is intended, it will indeed create a nice little community of peaceful (?) players. </p>
<p>Anyway, I apologise for alienating you and your group, it&#8217;s just that I honestly feel that there will not be a fair competition. Until recently I was under the impression that Titan would be the sole creators anyway, given their approach when talking about it.</p>
<p>So, they say there&#8217;s going to be one &#8216;company&#8217; building the weapons? Mmm&#8230; why not just have the other doing the UpGrade system? After all, any bias presented by one group would quickly be outweighed by the other. </p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve just returned from another trip into Second Life and I saw something of the meeting thanks to a supplied chatlog. Seems to me that Ethan has focussed his agression more on &#8220;Alienating the Alliance Navy&#8221; than &#8220;Providing a fun, fair combat system for Second Life militaries&#8221;. Maybe I&#8217;m just paranoid, but Ethan has never seemed such a giving person in other, earlier conversations. Neither have the Merczateers, who are funding this. It just&#8230; bothers me as to the possibilities of a hidden agenda here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Yeats</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Yeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Hmm...

Interesting comment. As the founder of WGA, I just might have gotten a little angry at your statement above, however, I will be in open competition with Titan, and I will honor any decision made by Ethan as to whom gets the honor to create the system.

Only time will tell, and I am starting to not put as much emphysis on my Military roots. I would love to create GunGrade, but if I am not chosen, I will respectfully honor the decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Interesting comment. As the founder of WGA, I just might have gotten a little angry at your statement above, however, I will be in open competition with Titan, and I will honor any decision made by Ethan as to whom gets the honor to create the system.</p>
<p>Only time will tell, and I am starting to not put as much emphysis on my Military roots. I would love to create GunGrade, but if I am not chosen, I will respectfully honor the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>So, GunGrade. Seems to me like this a simple way for Titan to cash in on the group animosity towards the Alliance Navy. Sure, it hasn't been properly announced yet, but what else would Titan do? There is quite literally no chance in hell that WGA would get the contract. As for both getting it? Well, wasn't the point to have one standard produced by one group?

Anyway, I've been chatting to a fair amount of people as of late (just for curiosity's sake) and I came across something very odd indeed. See, I was always wondering "Why now?". This sort of project must have been contemplated for a lengthy period of time (or possibly not, seeing the amount of "I'm not quite sure..." answers given by Mr Ethan Schuman) and it puzzled me as to why it was implementated directly after Operation Crucifix. I came to the conclusion that, had the Merczateers not been so thouroughly beaten, they would have had enough confidence to say "No" to the ANSUCKS/MOSCOW treaty. Given recent events, however, it's been much easier to influence them.

Humiliation. The common link. Each and every signatory has, at some point, been thoroughly beaten by the Alliance Navy. And if you lot can't win, it seems you're going to take your toys elsewhere. Simple.

I fail to see how this is going to isolate the Alliance Navy in the slightest. I imagine that this will merely free them of any reasonable competition for, what, a month? Ample time to do some updating of weapons and vehicles. Militaries will always spring up, and if you think you can bring them all in under the treaty, you're going to get one hell of a rude awakening.

P.S. The Alliance Navy are not the only ones with enemies. What happens when you get attacked by somone who isn't playing by your rules? Ask them nicely to go away? Greifers will always exist, and it so seems that you lot will have to resort back to your more... ah, unorthodox tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, GunGrade. Seems to me like this a simple way for Titan to cash in on the group animosity towards the Alliance Navy. Sure, it hasn&#8217;t been properly announced yet, but what else would Titan do? There is quite literally no chance in hell that WGA would get the contract. As for both getting it? Well, wasn&#8217;t the point to have one standard produced by one group?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve been chatting to a fair amount of people as of late (just for curiosity&#8217;s sake) and I came across something very odd indeed. See, I was always wondering &#8220;Why now?&#8221;. This sort of project must have been contemplated for a lengthy period of time (or possibly not, seeing the amount of &#8220;I&#8217;m not quite sure&#8230;&#8221; answers given by Mr Ethan Schuman) and it puzzled me as to why it was implementated directly after Operation Crucifix. I came to the conclusion that, had the Merczateers not been so thouroughly beaten, they would have had enough confidence to say &#8220;No&#8221; to the ANSUCKS/MOSCOW treaty. Given recent events, however, it&#8217;s been much easier to influence them.</p>
<p>Humiliation. The common link. Each and every signatory has, at some point, been thoroughly beaten by the Alliance Navy. And if you lot can&#8217;t win, it seems you&#8217;re going to take your toys elsewhere. Simple.</p>
<p>I fail to see how this is going to isolate the Alliance Navy in the slightest. I imagine that this will merely free them of any reasonable competition for, what, a month? Ample time to do some updating of weapons and vehicles. Militaries will always spring up, and if you think you can bring them all in under the treaty, you&#8217;re going to get one hell of a rude awakening.</p>
<p>P.S. The Alliance Navy are not the only ones with enemies. What happens when you get attacked by somone who isn&#8217;t playing by your rules? Ask them nicely to go away? Greifers will always exist, and it so seems that you lot will have to resort back to your more&#8230; ah, unorthodox tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griffin Yeats</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Griffin Yeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>For confusion's sake:

In my most recent comment, I stated "I find that highly unlikely..."
That phrase was a response to "...How’s that for a shocker? If you actually treat the AN with respect, they reciprocate."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For confusion&#8217;s sake:</p>
<p>In my most recent comment, I stated &#8220;I find that highly unlikely&#8230;&#8221;<br />
That phrase was a response to &#8220;&#8230;How’s that for a shocker? If you actually treat the AN with respect, they reciprocate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Hocho</title>
		<link>http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Hocho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sltimes.wordpress.com/2007/04/15/editorial-the-worst-article-ive-ever-wrote/#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>I rarely if ever respond to these, however out of respect I will this once. 

Bruno, you are most assuredly correct.  The AN, and I believe I speak not just for myself, does in fact respect you, your position and your stated goals for Sparta.    

Judge Hocho, Lt. Col., AN AD Wing Commander</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely if ever respond to these, however out of respect I will this once. </p>
<p>Bruno, you are most assuredly correct.  The AN, and I believe I speak not just for myself, does in fact respect you, your position and your stated goals for Sparta.    </p>
<p>Judge Hocho, Lt. Col., AN AD Wing Commander</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
